by Myrna Velasco January 31, 2016
The Department of Energy (DOE) is
shifting tack on its crafting of the Philippine Energy Plan (PEP), taking it
mainly from a bottom-up approach rather than a top-down scheme.
In his presentation to the media,
DOE director Jess Tamang noted they are now focusing on undertaking first the
regional energy plans that will eventually be integrated into the comprehensive
PEP.
He stressed that in the past, energy
planning had been done more on a top-down approach – meaning, the core numbers
were taken from a generally national scale rather than referencing them from
regional or geographical levels.
Tamang added energy supply-demand
scenarios had been drawn on two paradigms: one is business-as-usual (BAU)
scenario; while the other is on “clean energy platform” that amalgamates with
the Intended Nationally-Determined Contributions (INDC) to carbon footprints
reduction that the Philippines has committed in the United Nations’ 21st
Conference of Parties (COP) on Climate Change in Paris last December.
An updated and all-inclusive
country-level energy plan had been one of the promised targets of seating
Secretary Zenaida Y. Monsada, a reversal from just the typical “outlooks” being
presented to stakeholders in the past five years.
As culled from the assumptions
penciled in by the government. Tamang noted that the economic growth forecast
reference to be factored in into the PEP would be at ranges of 6.5-8.0 percent
within 2015 to 2030 timeframe.
For year 2016, the gross domestic
product (GDP) growth rate taken into account is at a high of 8.0-percent; while
in 2017, it will be at 7.0-percent.
Economic growth assumptions are
projected to slow down around 2018-2030, but still at a brisk pace of
6.5-percent.
Tamang said the PEP numbers being
crunched have been based on the macroeconomic targets set by the Development
Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) of the National Economic and Development
Authority.
The energy official emphasized
though that as far as population growth is concerned, it would likely be pared
to 1.85-percent annually from a higher base of 2.0-percent in the past.
He noted this has been due to the
fact that many of the professional segments of the population have been
postponing marriage to a later period.
No comments:
Post a Comment