Boo Chanco (The Philippine Star) -
May 27, 2016 - 12:00am
I know… some people will say we
don’t need emergency powers to solve any of government’s problems provided
officials are competent, have political will and are not thieves.
Cory Aquino had enough
emergency powers, revolutionary in fact after EDSA 1, but she didn’t know how
to use them and was uneasy using it when she did.
FVR sought and got emergency power
to deal with the power crisis, but his man in Napocor abused it. We ended
buying more power plants than we needed.
Worse, FVR’s man bought those plants
with a take or pay stipulation. We ended up paying for potential power output
we didn’t use because the abuse created a surplus in supply.
P-Noy sought, but didn’t get
emergency power to help deal with a looming power shortage two years ago.
Luckily, Congress denied him or we would have bought generators we ended up not
needing. The lack of emergency power made Energy Secretary Icot Petilla more
creative and he came up with a deal with private sector businesses like malls
that have standby power.
This time, however, I share the view
of the Management Association of the Philippines (MAP) that we need emergency
powers to end our worsening transportation and traffic problems. MAP pointed
out “the transportation and traffic crisis ongoing for at least five years have
been causing immense damage to the economy.”
Indeed, the estimated damage in 2012
is at a staggering P2.4 billion per day or about P576 billion annually. This is
in terms of higher operating cost in addition to lost income opportunities and
productivity, higher foreign exchange outflow for fuel and redundant
transportation equipment.
The traffic crisis also “exacts
heavy social cost owing to impaired quality of life, disruption to family life
and social ties, degrading public health and the environment due to vehicle
emissions, and impairing the image and competitiveness standing of the
country.”
Whoever accepts the DOTC portfolio
in the incoming Duterte administration (I am not sure Mr Art Tugade has
formally accepted the offer) will be a failure unless he is protected from TROs
and other suits. He must also be allowed to cut through government’s red tape
to produce noticeable change within the first three months.
We need to give the new DOTC
secretary extraordinary powers to solve problems that impede solutions like
delays in securing right of way for vital transport projects.
LRT1 extension to Bacoor, for
instance, is stalled even if the Ayala-MPIC consortium is ready to start
building because of right of way problems. I heard they bought the wrong
properties for right of way, among other not so innocent things on the road
called Daang Matuwid.
To fix the horrible problems related
to abusive bus drivers and excess buses along EDSA, the DOTC secretary must
have the power to revise existing bus and jeepney franchises and routes,
organize bus companies into specific consortia, reduce the number of buses on
the EDSA route and require bus operators to pay salaries to bus drivers and
conductors instead of demanding boundaries. Without extraordinary powers, the
DOTC secretary will be delayed by nuisance suits.
Congress should also give the DOTC
secretary enough leeway to use resources of other government agencies, from
manpower and equipment, as needed to make traffic flow smoothly.
The DOTC secretary must have the
power to void any local ordinances that grant permits to vendors or other
businesses to use roadways for parking, tiangges or car repair shops. It
must be specified the DOTC secretary’s decision must trump any LGU preference
as it affects traffic flow even in secondary routes.
The DOTC secretary must also be
given authority to settle commercial disputes involving all DOTC, projects that
delay completion to the public’s disadvantage. This includes that long standing
dispute on where to put the common station that is delaying the LRT1 extension
project.
Another example is the contract
dispute that is delaying the Bicol International Airport. While the parties may
still seek a court solution, all transportation projects must be allowed to
proceed without any TRO. Aggrieved parties may seek damages later on, but vital
projects must not be delayed.
The DOTC secretary must be given
powers to hire needed professionals to carry out projects outside of the normal
government hiring process. The problem at DOTC, as even Budget Secretary Butch
Abad once described it, is a technical deficit. No DOTC secretary can give
quick relief to our crisis level problems unless he can get competent technical
professionals to help him.
Also needed is the power of the DOTC
secretary to do emergency procurement as needed to guarantee uninterrupted
service and passenger safety specially for MRT3 and PNR. He must also have the
power to force a settlement of long running issues in MRT3 that may be
necessary to complete its rehabilitation.
The Duterte DOTC secretary must be
like Duterte himself — straight talking and with balls to get his job done even
if vested interests are hurt. The problem with P-Noy’s and Mar Roxas’s DOTC is
that the officials had no commitment to get any projects done. The many lawyers
Mar hired were more interested in protecting Mar and Abaya than rolling out
projects.
In exchange for these emergency
powers, the Duterte DOTC secretary must produce a timeline of projects,
specifying what he hopes to accomplish in three months, six months, one year,
two years, etc. Some projects in his priority list may be easier to accomplish
than others. Adjustments in the time line can be made as we go along.
I have this discussion with MAP’s
Eddie Yap on whether an Executive Order or a Republic Act is needed. Whatever
form may be appropriate, it is necessary to give the Duterte DOTC secretary the
powers to cut through usual rules to accomplish noticeable improvements not
just on EDSA, but also for the whole country.
People voted for Mr. Duterte because
they think he can deliver, even if he has to abolish Congress as he once
promised. What MAP is proposing is not that radical given our current dire
situation in transportation and Metro Manila traffic jams.
No comments:
Post a Comment