Published
By Myrna M. Velasco
Asset-seller firm Power
Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation (PSALM) is still in the
process of assessing the technical and financial requirements it shall be
enforcing for the impending turnover of the 153.1-megawatt Naga thermal power
facility in Cebu to Therma Visayas Power Inc. (TVPI) of the Aboitiz Group.
According to PSALM
Officer-in-Charge Lourdes S. Alzona, these are the discussion points they still
have at management level relating to the asset’s divestment – in relation to an
order of the Supreme Court to have it awarded to the winning bidder, minus the
rght-to-top provision in the auction terms.
“PSALM is looking into
the technical and financial requirements for turnover and we’ll eventually be
getting Board approval for the reinstatement of the notice of award to TVPI as
ordered by the Supreme Court,” Alzona noted.
At this stage though,
she indicated that they are still legally hurdled from undertaking the asset
turnover because of the latest motion for reconsideration lodged by SPC Power
Corporation, the party that has been given the right-to-top in the sale process
for the asset.
“We are awaiting SC
resolution of the last motion for reconsideration filed by SPC Power prior to
turnover of the complex to TVPI,” she said.
The revert of the Naga
plant’s award to TVPI was ordered by the high court following the filing of a
case by former Senate Committee on Energy Chairman Sergio OsmeƱa III
questioning the “right-to-top” proviso in the bidding terms of the facility’s
privatization.
The “right-to-top”
condition had effectively given SPC Power the leverage to match and surpass by
5.0 percent the winning offer set for the asset at its auction.
That then added P54
million to the purchase offer of the Naga facility, or P1.143 billion compared
to the P1.088-billion winning bid of the Aboitiz Group.
Following the legal
complications on this asset’s divestment, PSALM has previously apprised media
that the payment for the asset is still “untouched,” and placed in a special
account labeled as “restricted.”
No comments:
Post a Comment