February 18, 2019 | 9:53 pm By Bienvenido S. Oplas,
Jr.
On the
Philippines’ GDP growth rates, the good news is that from 2010 to 2018, the
Philippines has been growing above 6% yearly except in 2011. High growth was
experienced in 2010 with 7.6% (recovery from 2008-2009 global financial
turmoil) and 2013 (election year) with 7.1%.
The bad news is that
these growth rates are not enough. The Philippines, with 106 million people,
has a GDP size in 2017 of only $314 billion while neighbors with their smaller
populations had similar or larger GDP sizes: Malaysia (32M) has $312B,
Singapore (5.8M) has $324B, Thailand (69M) has $490B. We need to grow 7-10% per
year for many years before we can even catch up with Thailand or Malaysia
(Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook [WEO] October 2018).
There are many factors
why our electricity supply and consumption is low compared to our neighbors,
like the thick, expansive bureaucracies and permits required before one can
explore and develop new power plants.
We focus on the role
and “mis-role” of electric cooperatives (ECs). Since they are geographical
monopolies granted with congressional franchise to distribute electricity, they
can help expand or restrict power demand. If an EC for instance is mismanaged
and does not pay the power generation company (genco), even if the genco has
big plans to expand power capacity, it cannot do so.
The Department of
Energy (DoE) has issued two media releases related to problematic ECs dated
February 01 and February 06. It noted that many ECs are failures in expanding
rural electrification because of “inefficient management, corruption,
unnecessary political interference, institutional conflicts.”
So DoE will conduct a
performance review of ECs, especially those that burden their communities with
persistent and unresolved brownouts, because they have heavy debts and do not
pay their power supply. Underperforming ones will be assisted while
non-performing ones will be recommended for cancellation of their franchises.
DOE has identified 17
ECs that are chronic failures to provide satisfactory services to their
customers as stipulated in their congressional franchise. Seven are from
Regions IV-B and V — ALECO (Albay), CASURECO III (Camarines Sur), FICELCO (Catanduanes),
MASELCO (Masbate), OMECO (Occidental Mindoro), ORMECO (Oriental Mindoro), and
PALECO (Palawan). Other problematic ECs are PELCO (Pampanga), BASELCO
(Basilan), LASURECO (Lanao), SULECO (Sulu), ZAMCELCO (Zamboanga), and DANECO
(Davao del Norte).
Then certain islands
have rising missionary subsidies — which are then passed on to all electricity
consumers nationwide via high universal charges.
In three previous
articles in this column, “Unstable power supply due to problematic electric
cooperatives” (February 08, 2017), “How the bureaucracy works against cheap and
stable electricity (March 08, 2017), and “Corporatization of electric
cooperatives can reduce system loss” (September 29, 2017), it is argued that
ultimately all ECs should be corporatized and depoliticized, be registered as
corporations with SEC, and not with NEA.
No comments:
Post a Comment