By Lenie Lectura - November 11, 2019
THE Department of Energy (DOE) is
expected to issue new rules on the competitive selection process (CSP) to govern
power firms that are engaged in both power generation and distribution.
This proposal was raised by
Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi following the still unresolved issue on the
rebidding of 1,200 megawatt (MW) greenfield power-supply requirement of the Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) via CSP.
Cusi has provided inputs to Meralco
on how the power-supply contract should be bidded out. Meralco, on the other
hand, has insisted on its own terms of reference (TOR).
Cusi said the agency received a
letter from Meralco explaining why it prefers a new power plant, rather than
existing power facilities, to supply the utility firm. There were also other
concerns raised by Meralco in the letter.
“They are a private entity…we have
CSP rules…. It’s difficult in the case of Meralco; the reason I want it
open [to all types of plants] is because they are the DU [distribution utility]
and, at the same time, owner of generation. That’s why that system for that CSP
should be different,” Cusi said.
As such, Cusi pointed out the need
for the DOE to come up with a CSP template to avoid conflict of interest. This
template will spell out the rules on how supply deals should be bidded out,
particularly if the DU’s affiliate or unit is also engaged in power
generation.
Atimonan One Energy Inc. of
Meralco PowerGen Corp.(MGen) was the sole bidder of the 1,200 MW
greenfield power-supply contract. The Third Party Bids and Awards Committee
decided to hold a rebidding since only one firm participated. The DOE, however,
has yet to approve the TOR.
MGen is the power generation arm of
Meralco.
Cusi pointed out that existing power
plants operated and owned by other power firms should also be allowed to
participate in the CSP for Meralco’s 1,2000 MW greenfield power-supply contract
for 20 years.
“We need power and energy.
What we want is to make it competitive and open to all. What we are saying is,
if they want me to approve the TOR, I am telling them the kind of TOR that I
want. They said they don’t love my TOR, I can’t do anything,” Cusi said.
Cusi said it is Meralco’s
prerogative to publish the TOR. However, Cusi stressed that the TOR, if
published, is not approved by his office. “[In] the first bidding, they said I
approved it but I only approved the publication. I also replied to their
letter,” Cusi said.
DOE
may reprimand—Win
Meanwhile, Senate Energy Committee
Head Sherwin Gatchalian said the DOE is authorized to reprimand Meralco should
it push through with the publication.
“Let competition come in and let the
TOR be neutral, fair and transparent,” he said. “I think, well, if they
don’t…there are many remedies. For example, if they insist on their own
TOR, I believe DOE can reprimand them and can also penalize them,” he
said.
The committee, he added, can also
conduct an investigation.
Meralco President Ray Espinosa
had said that the company has considered the DOE’s inputs but “would proceed on
the basis of what we have set out originally, which is to differentiate the
brownfield from the greenfield.”
He meant to underscore that there
are financial and economic differences between brownfield and greenfield
plants. He also explained that power-supply agreements (PSAs) that are awarded
to these types of plants vary and differ in financial and economic terms.
“It will be difficult for us to move
to a situation where a greenfield capacity that we need to ensure reliable and
affordable supply will eventually be open to older and preexisting plants that
will crowd out investors or power generators who want to build new
plants.
“It would simply be very difficult
for them to compete. There is no discrimination against the existing and old
plants.
“We cannot just have a situation
where the existing plants and brownfield plants also compete for the greenfield
capacity,” Espinosa said.
Espinosa pointed out that Meralco’s
intention is to explain to the DOE the need “to maintain this dichotomy because
it’s only in this dichotomy that incentives are provided to build new
plants.”
He added: “We feel that our
position is reasonable and that we basically have the basis upon which to go
for a second round of CSP for the 1,200 MW.”
No comments:
Post a Comment