By
Lenie Lectura -June 27, 2017
THE Energy Regulatory
Commission (ERC) denied the recommendation of a former investigating staff to
consolidate the cases involving anticompetitive behavior and market abuse
against the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) and Therma Mobile Inc. (TMO) and
another similar case against 1590 Energy Corp. (1590EC).
The move to consolidate
these two cases was sought by Isabelo Joseph Tomas II, former investigating
officer of the investigating unit established by the ERC. He has since resigned
from the ERC.
In his motion, Tomas
sought the consolidation of the two cases alleging there are common questions
of law in all of them since respondents’ acts pertained to identical violations
of the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (Epira) and its rules, specifically
noncompliance with the Must-Offer Rule.
Tomas said the
consolidation of the cases “would avoid unnecessary costs of delay and
facilitate the resolution of the cases and avoid different or contradicting
findings.”
In its eight-page
order, the ERC agreed with the respondents that there were no common questions
of fact in the two cases to merit consolidation.
“The cases do not
involve the same parties. While the complainant may be the same for all cases,
respondents are different and distinct,” the ERC said.
Also, the commission
said the cases filed against the respondents did not arise from the same act or
transaction as the alleged violations occurred during different trading
intervals.
TMO and Meralco were
charged for employing a bidding strategy, through their power-supply agreement
(PSA), that resulted to the former’s power plant being the marginal clearing
plant for a total of 78 times during the period October 26, 2013, to December
2013.
1590 EC was charged,
meanwhile, for consistently offering the price of P62,000 per megawatt (MW)
during delivery hours of 1 to 7 which became the clearing price for 11 times.
The ERC said that,
while all respondents were charged with anti-competitive behavior, the acts
imputed to them were different and not, in any way, connected.
The imputation against
TMO and Meralco arose from their PSA. In contrast, the charge against 1590 EC
referred to its conduct of consistently bidding at P62,000 per MW during
trading intervals of 1 to 7.
“Verily, there is no
allegation in any of these cases that there has been collusion or conspiracy
between or among two or more respondents. Each respondent has been charged
individually,” the ERC said.
Since the respondents
were not similarly situated and the imputed acts were different and pertained
to different trading intervals, the issues against respondents were different,
the ERC said.
“As each case is different
from one another, complainant’s apprehension of an incomplete, incomprehensive
and inconsistent determination of all related issues was unfounded. One case
was not dependent on another and the decision in one naturally depended on the
distinct factual circumstances of that case and the evidence presented.”
The Philippine
Electricity Market Corp. (PEMC), operator of the Wholesale Electricity Spot
Market, found 11 companies (12 power plants) that breached the must-offer rule
during the October 25 to December 25, 2013, supply month when power prices shot
up due to the Malampaya natural-gas facility shutdown.
The PEMC’s Enforcement
and Compliance Office confirmed “finding of breached and approved the
imposition of penalties” on the following companies due to breach of the
must-offer rule.
The companies are 1590
Energy Corp. (Bauang diesel plant), AP Renewables Inc. (Makban geothermal power
plant), Therma Mobile Inc. (Therma Mobile diesel plant), CIP II Power Corp.
(CIP diesel plant), Trans-Asia Power Generating Corp. (Trans-Asia diesel power
plant), Udenna Mgt. and Resources Corp. (Subic diesel-power plant), Strategic
Power Development Corp. (San Roque hydropower plant), Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. (Casecnan hydropower plant), PSALM (Malaya diesel
power plant), Panasia Energy Inc. (Limay diesel-power plant), GN Power
(Mariveles coal plant) and Sem-Calaca Power Corp. (Batangas coal plant).
No comments:
Post a Comment