Philippine Daily
Inquirer / 08:25 AM July 06, 2017
It is “unacceptable” to
let the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) and its power suppliers dictate the
electricity rates that their consumers would be paying for up to 20 years, a
militant party-list congressman said on Tuesday.
Bayan Muna party-list
Rep. Carlos Zarate said that it was to the benefit of the consumers to keep
rates pegged for a long period, and that it was unacceptable to rely on the
assurance of Meralco and its power suppliers.
The militant lawmaker
gave this statement during the continuation of the joint House panel’s
investigation on allegations the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) extended a
deadline to comply with competitive bidding rules to favor Meralco.
Meralco first vice
president Ivanna de la Peña said during the hearing that there was one variable
of the power supply contracts that was beyond their control—the fuel costs.
“There is a component
there that is beyond our control, which is the fuel cost. Any power supplier
would not accept that it is fixed for the entire duration [of the contract].
“So if there is
escalation, it’s in the fuel cost. The only variable cost is fuel cost,” she
said.
Meralco’s legal and
corporate governance head, Bill Pamintuan, said all seven power supply deals
“complied with all legal requirements.”
The joint panel was
composed of the committee on good government and public accountability and the
energy committee of the House of Representatives.
The panel tackled House
Resolution No. 566 filed by Zarate, who is questioning the seven proposed power
supply agreements that Meralco had submitted to the Energy Regulatory
Commission (ERC).
‘Midnight deals’
Zarate has called these
seven contracts “midnight deals.”
He said consumers could
lose P12.44 billion annually due to the seven Meralco power supply agreements
that were accommodated because of a six-month extension granted by the ERC
beginning in November 2015.
According to Zarate,
the ERC commissioners allowed Meralco to forge the 20-year supply deals with
seven affiliates of the power utility without a competitive selection process.
“We can theoretically agree
on something here, but in reality we’ll be tied up for 20 years, there is a
claim earlier that were lower prices. Why didn’t Meralco choose those,” he said
during the hearing.
BH party-list Rep.
Bernadette Herrera-Dy echoed Zarate’s concerns.
“I would like to listen
to the side of Meralco and ask: What is our flexibility clause in the
contracts?” she said.
“It’s frightening to
approve a 20-year contract that we don’t know the price flexibility clause that
we have. Alternative energy can decrease anytime, cheaper than what is being
stated in the contract,” Dy noted.
No comments:
Post a Comment