by Myrna Velasco February 29, 2016
HOUSTON, Texas – As many power
project lenders and turnkey contractors have been raising serious concerns
about the competitive selection process (CSP) on power supply contracting, the
Department of Energy (DOE) noted that it is urgently necessarily for the
relevant government agencies to issue more definitive rules on the ‘less
understood and unresolved parameters’ of the policy.
Asked by international attendees
during her presentation at last week’s IHS-CERA Week here as to the concerns or
hurdles the government has encountered on its CSP policy, Energy Secretary
Zenaida Y. Monsada admitted that “there is still a need to issue more detailed
regulations to guide industry players and to set some balance on the industry’s
requirements.”
The issued Circular by the DOE and
the corresponding Resolution of the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) on the
mandate, she said, appeared that they cannot stand alone, thus, the crafting of
the guidelines would be one of the priority concerns that must be fixed.
“We just issued the requirement for
this (CSP), but we need to issue more detailed regulations,” she stressed.
On DOE’s end, she noted that they
would push for the categorization of power plant technologies as part of the
parameters in the bidding process.
By that, she meant that each
technology shall be competing with their counterparts – because if the auction
will accommodate mix of technologies, coal might always end up the winning
bidder based on the ‘least cost option’ paradigm.
“We thought of categorizing the
power plants. Because as it is now, only coal can bid the cheapest, so to guide
players and set some balance, we need to do the technology categorization,” she
expounded.
That would be in addition to the
energy department’s endless bid for a ‘third party aggregator’ – at least for
the power supply deals of the electric cooperatives.
In a separate interview after her
talks, Monsada disclosed that many lenders, power plant investors and even
engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors have raised some
questions as to how power projects would go about the CSP requirement – as even
the off-taker DUs seem to be lost on the policy’s framework.
She acknowledged that this has been
prompting her to seek an immediate meeting with the ERC so they can finally tie
the loose ends of the policy.
Monsada said she will be sending a
formal letter to ERC Chairman Jose Vicente B. Salazar so they can jointly
resolve the issues and concerns being raised by power investors, their lenders
and even EPC contractors.
In a random check with industry
players, they noted that they are having dilemmas on delayed approval of their
power supply agreements which in essence have been igniting worries among their
creditors and contractors.
The CSP also entails additional cost
burden to many power generators because they are the ones shelling out cash if
the contracting distribution utilities – primarily the electric cooperatives –
would not have the wherewithal for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment