By:
Daxim L. Lucas - November 17, 2016
Coal-fired power plants
will remain a permanent fixture—despite the strong lobby against them by
environmentalists and proponents of other energy sources—because these could
help the Philippines rapidly meet its growing energy needs cost-efficiently,
the Department of Energy said Wednesday.
At the same time,
however, policy makers recognized the legitimate concerns of coal power’s
opponents and vowed to balance the concerns of all stakeholders in the country,
according to Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi.
“The signs of the times
seem to tell us that coal is here to stay,” he said in a speech delivered at
the 2016 Coal Business and Policy Forum in Makati City, even as the energy
chief stressed that the implementation of coal energy policy “must be done
right” to address the criticism being leveled against it.
“One quarter says that ‘clean coal’ is the
wave of the future, the game-changer in the coal-fired power industry,” Cusi
said. “However, another quarter argues the opposite; that it is not only a
total misnomer, but is utterly impossible.”
Data from the
Department of Energy showed that coal power provides the single-biggest source
of electricity for the country today. As of 2015, 45 percent of the
Philippines’ generated electricity came from coal—a sharp rise from the
1-percent share it had when the country first began to use coal as a power
source in 1981.
“And with new
coal-fired power plants in the offing, the figure is expected to increase, or
at the very least, remain so for a considerable period,” Cusi said.
The energy chief noted,
however, that the energy and environmental landscape has changed dramatically
in the 35 years since coal power was first adopted locally.
“Growing concerns about
the environment and climate change have triggered public clamor for clean and
sustainable energy. As a dutiful member of the international community, we have
pledged to actively contribute to the cause of climate change mitigation,” he
said.
“But then again, our
country’s social and economic circumstances have also changed,” he added. “We
are beset by the twin problems of high electricity costs and a growing demand
that far outpaces our generation capacity.”
At the same time, coal
prices have gone down on the international market and the bullish expectations
in the US of a resurgence of its coal industry due to recent political
developments might push prices even lower.
“Because of all these,
we ineluctably find ourselves caught between the horns of an ‘energy
trilemma’,” Cusi said. “We grapple with the difficult task of trying to find
the balance among the equally pressing demands of energy security,
environmental sustainability and economic competitiveness.”
A key hurdle for the
coal power industry, however, is Environment Secretary Gina Lopez, who has
voiced her opposition to what she described as “a form of energy that has no
future.”
Coal power is also
being opposed by another major player in the industry, First Gen Corp., which
is controlled by the Lopez family from which the environment chief hails. First
Gen’s largest generation plants are powered by natural gas, which is the
closest rival to coal—albeit slightly more expensive—in terms of cost
structure.
Cusi said he believed,
however, that coal has a role to play in the Philippines’ so-called “energy
mix,” especially in providing cheap and reliable baseload power amid the
country’s steadily growing electricity needs.
“[This] highlights the
importance of a conscious and continuing pursuit of that wholesome balance that
we desire: A perfect policy coupled with a sound economic logic,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment