By Danessa Rivera (The
Philippine Star) | Updated April 25, 2017 - 12:00am
MANILA, Philippines - The Department
of Energy (DOE) is pushing for a mandatory shift to the Retail Competition and
Open Access (RCOA), which is being challenged in court.
This is despite earlier
pronouncements of supporting a voluntary transition to the open market scheme.
A mandatory transition will actually
develop the market by bringing in more competition and allowing more freedom of
choice for consumers, DOE Undersecretary Felix William Fuentebella said.
“Freedom of choice is the main
content, but what we’re saying is if transition will not be mandatory, there
won’t be new players in the retail electricity market and that might limit the
choice,” he said.
The position is included in the
motion for reconsideration filed with the Supreme Court.
“What we said in the MR (motion for
reconsideration) is we are emphasizing on the fairness in developing the
market,” Fuentebella said.
Last February, the high court issued
a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the DOE and Energy Regulatory Commission
(ERC) to implement the mandatory migration of large power consumers to RCOA.
The TRO was sought by the Philippine
Chamber of Commerce and Industry, San Beda College Alabang Inc., Ateneo de
Manila University and Riverbanks Development Corp., which said the new rules
supposedly limits the accredited suppliers for big power consumers which must
be given a choice whether to stay with their current distribution utility
suppliers.
RCOA is mandated by the Electric
Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 which aims to institutionalize competition in
the supply of electricity, allowing the electricity end-users to choose their
suppliers based on low price and other factors.
The mandatory migration to RCOA of
end-users with at least one megawatt (MW) usage was scheduled last Feb. 26.
Previously, the DOE said it would
come up with the rules for a voluntary transition to RCOA.
But the ERC commissioners met with
DOE Secretary Alfonso Cusi to explain the mandatory shift would actually bring
more retail electricity players and eventually promote freedom of choice,
Fuentebella said.
The decision, however, is still with
the high court whether RCOA would be mandatory or voluntary, he said.
Meanwhile, the Joint Congressional
Power Commission would issue its position on the RCOA, said Senator Sherwin
Gatchalian, who chairs the Senate Committee on Energy.
“We are now in the process of
reviewing the transcript and the spirit of RCOA during its initial deliberation
in the Senate and Congress,” he said. “We are still in the process but
definitely we will issue a resolution and hopefully that resolution will be used
and can be used either in the Supreme Court case.”
No comments:
Post a Comment