May 7, 2019 | 12:02 am
SEMIRARA Mining and
Power Corp. (SMPC) expects to sit down with the Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. (PSALM) to settle its money claim against the
agency, after the Commission on Audit (CoA) ruled in favor of the Consunji-led
company, company officials said.
“Matagal ng ’yung
Supreme Court ruling kaya lang hindi ma-enforce dahil walang CoA
ruling. So nakuha ’yung CoA ruling lately (The Supreme Court ruling is
old but it could not be enforced because it lacks CoA ruling. So the CoA ruling
was received lately),” SMPC Chairman and Chief Executive Isidro A. Consunji
said in a press briefing after the company’s annual stockholders’ meeting at
the Manila Polo Club in Makati City on Monday.
SCPC is claiming the
amount of P476,703,077.96 plus interest at 6% per annum computed from
extrajudicial demand until actual payment in the case decided by the Energy
Regulatory Commission in 2011 that went all the way to the Supreme Court.
The company told the
stock exchange that the CoA decision is dated April 22, 2019 but was furnished
to the company only on Monday.
The case stems from a
petition filed by SMPC subsidiary Sem-Calaca Power Corp. (SCPC) against
National Power Corp. (Napocor) and PSALM to declare as invalid Napocor’s
nomination for the supply of electricity to Manila Electric Co. (Meralco)
beyond 169,000 kilowatts (kW).
SCPC also sought to
recover the amount charged and withheld by PSALM for spot market purchases to
cover the deficiency in connection with Napocor’s over nominations for Meralco
for January to June 25, 2010.
The ERC ruled that
SCPC’s obligation under its contract is to deliver 10.841% of Meralco’s energy
requirements but not to exceed 169,000 kW capacity allocation, at any given
hour.
The obligation to
deliver started from Dec. 2, 2009 when the physical possession, occupation and
operation of the Calaca, Batangas power plant was formally turned over to SCPC.
The ERC said Napocor
and PSALM have no basis, in fact and in law, to charge against SCPC the
nominations beyond the 169,000 kW capacity that Napocor allegedly bought for
Meralco from the wholesale electricity spot market.
It said there being no
basis to charge SCPC, PSALM must return all the payments of Meralco, which were
withheld by the government agency. This includes the amount representing the
cost of electricity nominated and purchased by Napocor beyond the 169,000 kW
from the spot market from January 2010 to June 2010.
“I think they (PSALM)
will negotiate on the interest,” said Junalina S. Tabor, SMPC vice-president
and chief finance officer, adding the interest payment is subject to CoA computation.
John R. Sadullo, SMPC
vice-president for legal, said on the court procedure there was an opportunity
for PSALM to appeal, although the move may just be moot and academic.
“There’s already a
decision. As a government agency I think they should also abide by the
decision. Anyway, it took a very long time for this decision to come out,” he
said.
“Before the CoA decided
on this as a money claim, we already went up to the Supreme Court. Actually,
the CoA is implementing the decision of a final and executory judgement of the
Supreme Court. So for us, it’s going to be moot and academic even if they try
to do some procedural delay,” said Mr. Sadullo, who is SMPC corporate secretary
and counsel.
On Monday, shares in
SMPC slipped 1.46% to close at P23.65 each. — Victor V. Saulon
No comments:
Post a Comment