By Lenie Lectura - December 9, 2019
THE Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. (PSALM) will ask the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
to craft the best privatization scheme for the Caliraya-Botocan-Kalayaan
Hydroelectric Power Plant (CBKHPP) and Casecnan multipurpose hydropower
plant.
“We’re going to start studying the
two because as you know, the power plants, they have different structures. It’s
important to structure it well. We are seeking the assistance of ADB to look at
the technicalities of that. Hopefully, by next year, we will be able to decide
on privatizing the structure in terms of chronology. We will target CBK first
before Casecnan,” said PSALM President Irene Joy Garcia.
The CBK hydro facility consists of
the 22.6-MW Caliraya in Lumban, 20.8-MW Botocan in Majayjay and the 684.6-MW
Kalayaan I and II in Kalayaan, Laguna.
J-Power and Sumitomo Corp. of Japan
operate the CBK power plants.
The 140-MW Casecnan project was
built following the signing of a build-operate-transfer contract between the
National Irrigation Administration (MA) and California Energy Casecnan Water
and Energy Co. Inc. in 1994.
CE Casecnan’s contract with the
government will lapse on April 5, 2022, while that of J-Power will end on
February 7, 2026. The Casecnan asset is 60 percent owned by PSALM and 40
percent by the NIA.
Garcia said there are concerns
raised over the ownership of Casecnan. “Under the current
agreement, it’s really the NIA. However, there is a back-to-back agreement
between NIA and NPC, [to] transfer to PSALM the 60 percent.
By virtue of Epira (the Electric
Power Industry Reform Act), we step into the shoes of NPC and were supposed to
get the 60 percent. That’s precisely why there is a need to study. We need to
see how do we best structure the privatization. Obviously, we need to carve out
that 60 percent, so how do you carve it out? How do you divide the assets? Is
it going to be an identification of what are the irrigation assets and what are
the power assets? If you look at the agreements, there are really no
implementing provisions on exactly how to sort of divide the 60-40, so that’s
what we need to work on,” explained Garcia.
She added that PSALM has yet to
determine the scope of ADB’s assistance, i.e., if the study on the said power
assets includes the minimum bid price, among others.
“It’s like a consultancy assistance
from ADB. What is the extent of their scope of coverage, if it includes
everything we need for purposes of the privatization? We are fine-tuning…the
scope of the coverage of the study of ADB, so that by next year they can start
the study. I’m not very certain how much time they need, but I’m thinking
[it’s] six months before they come up with the study. Once there
is a list of recommendations, we will plot that into the privatization…
structure,” said the PSALM official.
No comments:
Post a Comment