04:17 AM January 07, 2020
BAGUIO CITY, Philippines — The
Department of Energy (DOE) has voided three renewable energy service contracts
that interfere with the operations of the American-era hydroelectric power
plants owned by the city government.
In a DOE resolution, Energy Secretary
Alfonso Cusi said the run-of-river plants to be put up by Goldlink Global
Energy Corp. along the Asin River in Tuba town, Benguet pro¬vince, were too
close to Baguio’s plants in Barangay Asin.
Goldlink applied and was granted
four hydro energy service contracts in 2013 and 2014 without disclosing their
impact on Baguio’s much older plants, Cusi said.
Goldlink, formed in 2012, had
asserted that its service contracts were acquired in good faith and its plants
were distinct from the Asin facilities, which were not operational.
Permit
required
The 3.2-megawatt Asin plants were
built in the 1920s to power up this city that was designed and built as the
alternate site for the American colonial government during summer.
The Baguio Water District and a
contracted operator, Aboitiz-owned Hydroelectric Development Corp., had
ope¬rated the Asin plants until their contract lapsed in 2006.
Baguio had then reacquired the
plants. Years later, Baguio was beset with legal problems, among them royalty
claims from Ibaloy residents at Barangay Nangalisan in Tuba where the plants
are located.
The Energy Regulatory Board also
required Baguio to secure a permit for power generation.
In 2015, Baguio awarded the plants’
maintenance and operation to Kaltimex Energy Philippines, but the city
government had been fighting with the contractor over its failure to start the
project.
Goldlink had bid to operate the
plants but was disqualified, after which it pursued its own power projects,
according to the DOE resolution.
Baguio challenged Goldlink’s service
contracts in 2015 when it learned that the power firm’s projects could
destabilize the Asin plants.
Cusi, in the resolution, said
“Goldlink committed serious misrepresentation,” which warranted the cancellation
of its service contracts over sections of the river flowing through Sitio
Sallapan, Nangalisan and Tadiangan.
He said the company either omitted
or hid the fact that its future plants’ overlap with the Asin facilities.
The DOE treated the Asin River as a
“frontier area,” or a body of water with potential as a power source but which
the agency had no technical information yet for development, Cusi said. —Vincent
Cabreza
No comments:
Post a Comment