by Myrna
Velasco November 10, 2015
SPC Power, which was held as the new
owner of the 153-megawatt Naga thermal power facility, will seek
reconsideration of the Supreme Court (SC)ruling on the “right to top” provision
in the facility’s divestment which also voided the asset’s sale process.
This was indicated by the company in
its disclosure to the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE), emphasizing that it
“intends to file a motion for reconsideration (MR)” on the high court’s
verdict.
In a separate press statement, the
Aboitiz group hailed the ultimate tribunal’s verdict as a manifestation of
“transparent and fair bidding process that encourages competition.”
On record, a corporate entity of the
Aboitiz group – the Therma Power Visayas, Inc. (TPVI) – was the original
highest bidder in the Naga plant’s privatization for a tender of P1.089
billion.
Nevertheless, the “right to top” in
the bidding terms permitted SPC Power to surpass that offer with a 5.0-percent
premium relative to the land-lease agreement (LLA) that is linked to the Asset
Purchase Agreement (APA) in the privatization deal.
This prompted SPC Power to make the
final offer of P1.14 billion that merited the turnover of the asset to it by
seller Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation.
Aboitiz Power stressed “we believe
TPVI won the bid,” with Business Unit head Benjamin A. Cariaso Jr. noting
that “had TPVI not participated, the government would have sold its asset at a
much lower price.”
The company further claimed that the
award of the facility had been done “hastily” despite “the unanswered issues
and the Supreme Court case questioning the validity of the right-to-top
provision.”
PSALM, it was gathered, is currently
studying its next step on the SC ruling as well as on any option it could take
in case this setback on the facility’s divestment would not be resolved.
The ownership changeover for the
Naga plant was effective September last year. It was among the last assets
privatized under the management of former PSALM president Emmanuel R. Ledesma
Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment