May 8, 2018 | 9:54 pm By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.
Last Monday, I discussed business
competition in general and the role of the Philippine Competition Commission
(PCC).
The theme will be continued in this
piece and it will discuss electricity competition in particular, especially
after I was able to interview PCC Chairman Arsenio Balisacan, the CEO of the
Philippine Electricity Market Corp. (PEMC) and Chairman of Transition Committee
Oscar Ala and PEMC Spokesperson Atty. Nino Juan.
The Electric Power Industry Reform
Act (EPIRA) of 2001 or RA 9136 has drastically liberalized the Philippines
electricity sector with at least three important provisions: (1) deregulation
and demonopolization of the power generation sector, (2) creation of the
Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM), and (3) liberalization and
demonopolization of electricity distribution via Retail Competition and Open
Access (RCOA).
With these and other provisions of
EPIRA, the questions to ask, among others would be:
(1) Were there many private
generation companies (gencos) that entered the market competing with each
other?
(2) Were there many retail
electricity suppliers (RES) that entered the market competing with each other?
(3) Were there many players, gencos
and distributors, that use the WESM spot market competition? And more
importantly, (4) Have electricity prices for consumers gone down?
The short answer is YES to all four
questions.
For gencos for instance, before
EPIRA, the National Power Corp. (Napocor) was the state-owned power generation
monopoly, which also incurred huge losses and public debts for many years.
As of April 2018, there were 113
gencos in the Luzon-Visayas grid alone and all of them are WESM participants.
Excluded are gencos in the Mindanao grid which is not part of WESM yet. Of
these 113 gencos, five players have become more efficient and more moneyed than
others, except perhaps the government-owned Power Sector Assets and Liabilities
Management Corporation (PSALM), which still owns previous Napocor-owned power
plants, mostly hydro facilities in Mindanao and the Malaya plant in Rizal.
For retail competition, the number
of contestable customers (CCs) or those with monthly peak demand of 750 KW or
higher and have the freedom to pick their own service providers — such as
electric cooperatives (ECs) and private distribution utilities (DUs) — have
increased. RCOA implementation however, has been issued an indefinite TRO by
the Supreme Court in February 2017 and this resulted in a decline in number of
CCs.
Here are the numbers for comparative
electricity prices that include two types of customers, the captive market
(small consumers who must stay with their DUs or ECs) and contestable market
(they can leave their DUs or ECs and choose their own RES).
Contestable customers are able to
enjoy lower average prices, P6.91/kWh, than captive customers that pay an
average price of P7.78/kWh.
So there you see it.
Despite the noise created by certain
sectors that EPIRA and WESM are not working, which leads them to call for a
return to the old scheme of nationalization, these data show that indeed
electricity competition is working.
It is true that Philippine
electricity prices in general remain higher than most of our neighbors in the
region but that is because of other factors like (a) many taxes especially the
high VAT of 12% applied in all parts of the electricity supply chain, from
generation to transmission, distribution and supply, even the system loss; (b)
many charges in our monthly electricity bill including universal charge, system
loss charge, feed-in-tariff (FiT) for favored renewables.
The transition of PEMC, the market
operator of WESM, into a real Independent Market Operator (IMO) as explicitly
specified in EPIRA may soon become a reality.
As a result, there will be no more
government energy agencies and bureaucracies at the PEMC Board. Good work, PEMC
Transition Team.
No comments:
Post a Comment