Wednesday, May 30, 2018

Phinma oil, gas exploration in Visayas, Camotes faces stiff opposition


By Jonathan L. Mayuga -

ENVIRONMENTAL groups are up in arms against a proposed oil and gas exploration project that threatens the livelihood of tens of thousands of municipal fishers in 30 coastal towns near the Visayas and Camotes seas.
The oil and gas exploration project covers over 500,000 hectares of municipal waters and stands to impact the Visayan Sea and adjacent protected area.
In a letter addressed to Energy Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi, Agriculture Secretary Emmanuel F. Pinol, Environment Secretary Roy A. Cimatu, Interior Secretary Eduardo M. Año, Cebu Gov. Hilario F. Davide III, Negros Occidental Gov. Alfredo G. Maranon Jr. and Iloilo Gov. Arthur D. Defensor Sr., Oceana Philippines Vice President Gloria Estenzo-Ramos said the municipal waters to be impacted by the project are for the preferential access of subsistence fishers.
In particular, leaders of the groups are questioning the issuance of Petroleum Service Contract 69, which they alleged was issued without compliance of the rigid requirements of various national laws and landmark Supreme Court rulings designed to protect the country’s fragile marine environment and the threatened species of fish, the marine environment and the people dependent on them for their survival.
In 2008 the Department of Energy awarded a petroleum service contract to Phinma Petroleum and Geothermal Inc. covering 528,000 hectares in the Visayan and Camotes seas.   It covers the municipal waters of 30 coastal towns in the provinces of Masbate, Cebu, Bohol and Leyte.
The Visayan Sea is a rich fishing ground and is being eyed as a fisheries management area. It is also adjacent to the Tañon Strait Protected Seascape (TSPS), the country’s largest marine-protected area and is a known migratory pathway of 14 identified species of whales and dolphins, making the contract area an environmentally critical area.
Aside from the TSPS, the contract area also straddles other protected areas, such as the Olango Island Wildlife, a Ramsar site or wetland of international importance, and the Cuatro Islas Protected Landscape and Seascape.
“It is patently a gross violation of the state-guaranteed duty to protect the rights of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology,” Ramos, an environmental lawyer, said in her letter.
Ramos said as heads of the various government agencies with the mandates of protecting “life-giving support systems” Cusi, Pinol, Cimatu, and Ano are expected “to take action and consider food security, ecological integrity and sustainable livelihoods over and above purely economic considerations”
Ramos, an environmental lawyer who won a landmark case in the Supreme Court to stop a similar project within the Tanon Strait several years ago, is supported by leaders of various environmental groups and people’s organizations who signed a position paper.
The signatories are Liza Elema-Osorio of Philippine Earth Justice Center, Delfa T. Talaid of Tambuyog Development Center, Celso Ilustrisimo of Maricaban Fisherfolk Association, Venerando Carbon, Brenette Abrenica, Socorro Atega, and Mariano Sarcol.
In their position paper, they said offshore drilling for oil and gas is a highly pollutive business.  “It discharges toxic wastes and carcinogens, leaks and spills oil, and disrupts hearing capacity of marine mammals during seismic surveys.”
They said exploration for offshore oil and gas in the Visayan and Camotes Seas must not be allowed because of the pollution from exploration and offshore drilling, the potential adverse impact that will cause the economic dislocation of tens of thousands of subsistence fishers.
They argued that with the project, subsistence fishers will be forced to spend extra for gasoline as they will be eventually banned from fishing in their traditional fishing grounds.
The protesters said the DOE awarded the Service Contract to Phinnma without prior consultation with the stakeholders.
“The Local Government Code requires a national agency authorizing any project that may cause pollution, climate change, depletion of non-renewable resources, and extinction of animal or plant species, to consult with the local government units, nongovernment organizations, and other stakeholdes,” the petition stated.
They said the concerned national government agencies must explain the goals and objectives of the project, its impact on the people and the environment and the measures to be undertaken to minimize its adverse effects.
“Without this consultations and prior approval of the Sanggunian, the service contract for petroleum cannot be implemented,” they said.

No comments:

Post a Comment