Published
By Myrna M. Velasco
https://business.mb.com.ph/2018/10/13/erc-prescribes-lock-down-period-on-all-power-supply-contracts/
It will no longer be
easy for flipping-generation companies to unload capacities that they have tied
to power supply agreements (PSAs) because the Energy Regulatory Commission
(ERC) shall soon be prescribing “lock down” proviso on contracts.
In the draft rules
issued by the regulatory body to relevant stakeholders, it is expressly stated
that “the winning bidder shall not be allowed to sell and/or assign the
contract to any other entity.”
The only exception,
according to the ERC, is if it has “given approval and determination of the
assignee or buyer’s legal, technical and financial eligibility.”
Beyond the competitive
selection process (CSP) via formal competitive bidding which is the method of
power supply contracting being instituted for DUs, the ERC will also be
allowing submission of unsolicited proposals from GenCos based on the published
requirement of specified power utilities.
DUs could refer to
privately owned power utilities such as the Manila Electric Company (Meralco),
Visayan Electric Company (VECO), Davao Light & Power Co., Cagayan Electric
Power and Light Company Inc. and others; as well as the country’s
over-a-hundred electric cooperatives.
In an unsolicited
tender, the ERC has prescriptions for capacity cap as stipulated in the draft
rules.
“The contracted
capacity subject of the unsolicited proposal shall not exceed 10-percent of the
DUs total annual peak demand,” the ERC has emphasized.
Additionally, the
regulator laid down that “the unsolicited proposal is made public and subjected
to competition,” stressing further that “when a distribution utility receives
an unsolicited proposal for the supply of electricity, the DU shall then
publish and invite third parties to match or improve it.”
The ERC specified that
“for an unsolicited proposal to be considered by the DU, the proponent has to
submit a complete proposal – which shall include a cover letter, feasibility
study which should indicate relevant assumptions; company profile; the draft
contract which adheres to the minimum terms provided and other documents that
are needed even if proprietary in nature.”
On Swiss challenge, the
ERC indicated that the bids and awards committee (BAC) “shall publish the
invitation for comparative proposals after receipt of the notification from the
original proponent that the latter accepts all the terms and conditions” – and
such must be explicitly stated in its letter of acceptance.
It was similarly
established that “the deadline for submission of comparative proposals shall
not be earlier than 60 days from the date of the last publication of the
invitation for comparative proposals.”
No comments:
Post a Comment