March 21, 2019 | 10:11 pm By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.
Continuing the
Market-Oriented Reforms for Efficiency (MORE) series in this column, we tackle
the importance of more electricity production in the development of
Asia-Pacific economies.
On Tuesday, March 19, I
attended the joint press conference of the Department of Energy (DoE), the
National Power Corporation (Napocor), National Transmission Corporation
(Transco), National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP), and Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) in formally announcing the Philippines hosting of two
big international energy events.
First, the Association
of the Electricity Supply Industry of East Asia and Western Pacific (AESIEAP)
in September 2019 in Shangrila Mactan, Cebu; second, the Conference of Electric
Power Supply Industry (CEPSI) at the Philippine International Convention Center
(PICC) in November 2020.
During the open forum, I commented that the Philippines holding these two big
energy events that are technology-neutral on energy sources is important, to
contrast with the renewable energy (RE) favoritism of the Asian Development
Bank’s Asia Clean Energy Forum (ACEF). The latter is an annual event
glamorizing the role of wind-solar and other renewables while implicitly
demonizing the role of fossil fuels in energy development in Asia. Their
delegates, speakers, and sponsors fly from all over the world on fossil fuel
then directly or indirectly lambast fossil fuel and talk of a “decarbonized
world” via RE favoritism and cronyism.
Having a technology-neutral
energy policy is important for fast economic growth and expansion of Asian
economies. For instance, despite the decades-long lobby to glamorize and
subsidize wind-solar and other renewables, fossil fuels provided 74% of total
electricity generation in Asia-Pacific in 2017, with many countries being more
than 80% fossil fuels-dependent — India, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Thailand, Taiwan, etc. (see table 1).
Other AESIEAP members
with low electricity generation are Cambodia, Laos, Macau, Nepal, Papua New
Guinea, and Sri Lanka. Hong Kong is also a member; its reported domestic
electricity production is small because mainland China supplies the rest.
High power generation
coincides or correlates with high economic expansion. The numbers are shown
below spanning 30 years from 1987 to 2017. High correlation is shown in some
countries like S. Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Taiwan, Thailand, and
Bangladesh (see table 2).
As shown in table 1,
the Philippines still has small power generation despite its huge population of
108 million (two times that of S. Korea, four times that of Australia). We need
more investments in the sector — in generation, transmission, distribution, and
supply.
Energy efficiency as
“substitute” for more power generation is not enough. If one will drive at
night in many provinces, one will notice that national and provincial roads are
dark and conducive to accidents, except in some city centers.
In many instances,
government taxes, permits and bureaucracies, plus occasional price control
(like the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market price cap), are among the
hindrances to more energy development. Government should learn to step back on
these.
No comments:
Post a Comment