Published
By Madelaine B. Miraflor
The country’s mining
sector will be in serious financial trouble once the government imposes a tax
regime currently being pushed for by the Department of Finance (DOF), which
could lead to the industry’s eventual downturn.
Gerard Brimo, chairman
of the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines (COMP), an organization of some of
the country’s largest mining operations, said in a roundtable discussion with
Business Bulletin that the DOF is “misguided” as to what the reasonable tax
regime is that should be applied to mining sector.
The discussion on new
fiscal regime in the mining sector has been going on for years. It formally
started in 2012 when former President Benigno Aquino 3rd issued Executive Order
(EO) 79, wherein no new mineral agreements shall be approved until a
legislation rationalizing existing revenue-sharing schemes and mechanisms shall
have taken effect.
When the Duterte administration took over, the government wanted to make sure
the country will benefit more from the mining sector, especially because the
Philippines is one of the most mineralized countries in the world.
As a start, the Senate
decided to include in the package one of Tax Reform for Acceleration and
Inclusion (TRAIN) an increase in the excise tax rate for minerals from 2
percent to 4 percent.
And since this
shouldn’t be enough for the EO 79 to be lifted, there is now a move to pass an
entirely new fiscal regime. Then in November last year, the House of
Representatives passed on third and final reading House Bill (HB) 8400, which
seeks to “rationalize and institute a single fiscal regime applicable to all
mineral agreements.”
From the original
proposal of the DOF, which imposes a 5 percent royalty on all mining firms in
and out of mineral reservations, HB 8400 now only mandate miners outside of
mineral reservations to pay to the government a margin-based royalty on income
from mining operations.
But the DOF on Tuesday has made a last-minute appeal to the Senate to pass its
original proposal of a uniform royalty rate of 5 percent for all mining
operations, whether located inside or outside a mineral reservation.
DOF’s proposal is
adopted in the Senate Bill (SB) 1979, which is currently being deliberated in
the Senate.
Brimo said if this is
passed, the government’s plan to gain more revenues from the mining sector will
no longer become reality.
His statement
contradicts what Finance Assistant Secretary Ma. Teresa Habitan told senators
that the DOF proposal would haul in an estimated P7.2 billion in incremental
revenues to the state coffers in the initial year of its implementation.
This, according to Habitan, is double the projected amount of P3.7 billion that the government will collect from an HB 8400 tax regime.
This, according to Habitan, is double the projected amount of P3.7 billion that the government will collect from an HB 8400 tax regime.
“If the 5 percent royalty is implemented plus the top-up tax of up to 50
percent for FTAA [Financial and Technical Assistance Agreement] gets retained,
then forget about this industry,” Brimo said.
“If the government is
out to get more revenues, it can’t get anything from this industry. We’re very
small. They need to increase the investments. Enlarge the pie,” he added.
Brimo said that if the
DOF proposal gets adopted in Senate, a couple of big copper mines would close
down, saying it’s not true that the government would earn as much as P7 billion
from mining tax.
Right now, the mining
industry contributes only 0.85 percent, or P134.5 billion, to the country’s
total gross domestic product (GDP). This is despite the fact the the country’s
mineral resources has an estimated value of around US.1.4 trillion.
The mining sector also
operates in 2.35 percent of the 9 million hectares of land in the country with
high mineral potential, with only 48 metallic mines and 61 non-metallic mines
that are operational.
Brimo said that even if EO 79 and the ban on open-pit mine are lifted, the
industry will still “absolutely” find it hard to develop if the DOF-proposed
tax regime will be implemented.
To date, there are
three open pit projects on hold due to the ban on open-pit mine, namely
Tampakan Copper Project, King-king Copper Gold Project, and Silangan Copper and
Gold Project.
Brimo said these
projects could bring the total industry contribution to exports to 9 percent
and total contribution to GDP to 1.5 percent.
Right now, Mines and
Geosciences Bureau (MGB) is now taking a look at possible revisions that could
be applied to the Implementing Rules and Regulaitons (IRR) of the Philippine
Mining Act of 1995, the main legislation that governs all mining and extractive
operations in the country.
To be specific, MGB
Director Wilfredo G. Moncano has recently ordered the review of the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources’s (DENR) Administrative Order (DAO) No.
2010-21, which was issued in 2010 to also implement a revised IRR for
Philippine Mining Act.
A statement from MGB
showed that Moncano’s directive is just the agency’s response to the mandate
given under the Republic Act No. 11032 or “an act promoting ease of doing
business and efficient delivery of government services, amending for the
purpose of republic act no. 9485, otherwise known as the anti-red tape act of
2007, and for other purposes”.
The agency, tasked to
regulate the mining sector, also wants to come up with a streamlined regulatory
framework and requirements for the securing of mining rights, as well as a more
simplified procedures for the mining applicants, contractors, permittee, or
permit holders.
The said review and
possible revision of DAO No. 2010-21 was agreed upon to discuss in the upcoming
workshop of MGB to be conducted tentatively next month.
The meeting will be attended by the personnel of MGB’s Mining Tenements
Division and the Legal Service Division as well as their counterparts in the
Regional Offices (ROs).
The MGB is currently
soliciting issues, comments, and suggestions from the ROs for the said workshop
mechanics and outlines.
Right now, the
Philippines ranks in the bottom seven out of 91 jurisdictions in terms of
mining policies and last in terms of investment attractiveness in the Australia
or Oceania region, a Fraser Institute 2017 survey showed.
Also, the Philippines
is losing billions of dollars in potential mining investments because of the
policy stalemate plaguing the industry.
Dindo Manhit, President
of Stratbase ADR Institute, said while countries such as Australia and
Indonesia managed to develop their mineral endowments as a strategic pillar of
their economies, the Philippine mining industry has become stagnant, following
the issuance of EO 79 and DENR’s DAO No. 2017-10, which both effectively banned
open pit mining.
“Our ability to
efficiently and sustainably harvest the country’s mineral wealth potential,
estimated to be worth more than a trillion dollars, just sitting underground
and basically untapped, has been mired in prolonged legal and regulatory
challenges,” Manhit said.
“To put in perspective
just how much opportunity we are losing, a 2016 list of just 11 pending
projects was estimated to total over US$23 billion in capital investments.
Compare this to the official figures of the BSP on our total foreign direct
investment from January to November last year which totaled only US$9.06
billion,” he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment