Published September 25, 2019, 10:00
PM By Myrna
M. Velasco
Lopez-owned First Gen Corporation is
opting for flexibility in the pricing as well as volume procurement terms in
the liquefied natural gas (LNG) contracts that it will be firming up with
global suppliers.
In a briefing with reporters, First
Gen Executive Vice President Jon Russell indicated that the company will be
having two-track contracting on its LNG supply needs: One will be for its
floating storage regasification unit (FSRU) that it targets to bring on
commercial stream by year 2021; and the next one will be for its onshore LNG terminal
which will be its longer term solution in sustaining the fuel needs of its
gas-fired power fleets in Batangas.
The company executive said they are
in discussions with about 20 LNG suppliers – mostly of multinational stature
and the biggest as well as the most credentialed gas suppliers in the world –
the likes of Royal Dutch Shell plc, Chevron, Exxon, BP and Total.
“We’re in separate discussion for
long term which is 2024 onwards; and also the short term if we execute that
plan of bringing in FSRU. We may even look at bringing in LNG early for the
periods 2021 to 2024,” he said.
Russell qualified though that the
LNG contracting part of the overall chain of their project implementation has
not been decided yet – and in the negotiation processes they have been holding
with suppliers, the company is on the lookout for “flexibility” that each
supplier would be able to offer.
“So what we will value is
flexibility in the supply. We want to get the most flexible terms, not just the
lowest price but one with flexibility. Because moving forward, the role of
natural gas will be in a flexible mode to support the introduction of what they
call intermittent renewables,” the First Gen executive explained.
He further stressed that the LNG
import facility to be spearheaded by First Gen and its partner Tokyo Gas Co.
Ltd. will “need LNG contracts to be supportive of that kind of role and
operations.”
Russell added “we don’t know yet
which one will be the best source of LNG for the Philippines. But whichever one
it would be, it has to recognize that the Philippines is different and other
parts of the world is not like selling LNG to Japan,” with him inferring that
the chosen LNG supplier must factor in the intricacies and the unique
characteristics the Philippine energy sector posits.
The terms of LNG procurements being
pondered upon, he said, could either be spot sourcing, short-term and long-term
contracts or a combination of all.
“In the short term, we would
definitely look at both – we look at essentially spot from time to time; then
maybe a short-term contract with one or more suppliers,” Russell expounded.
For the long-term contracts that may
be tailor-fitted to the needs of its onshore LNG terminal, the First Gen
executive indicated that the duration could be a stretch to seven to 15 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment