October 9, 2019 | 10:41 pm By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.
Among the
tricks used by the anti-fossil fuel, anti-coal groups is to never recognize
growth and economic modernization of countries that have relied on cheap,
stable and reliable energy source. So for this paper, I scoured through actual
numbers of coal consumption in million tons oil equivalent (mtoe) from
1965-2018, and GDP growth 1965-2018. Data source for the former is the BP
Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2019, and for the later, the WB,
World Development Indicators database, August 2019.
First I computed the
annual growth rate of coal mtoe from 1966 to 2018, then got the averages per 10
years. (See Table 1.)
The WB’s GDP growth
rates are already in percentages so I just computed the averages per 10 years.
(See Table 2.)
What do the numbers
show?
One, there is clear
correlation between growth in coal consumption and growth in GDP, for all
countries above in most years indicated. See the US, Australia, and Japan —
deceleration in coal use from 2006 to 2018 translated to low growth of below 3%
for the US and Australia, and a maximum of 1.1% growth for Japan. For Germany,
their energy transition away from coal resulted in ever-rising energy prices and
slow growth, below 2% from 1996-2018.
Two, for developing or
emerging economies: Turkey’s average coal use of about 5% a year also
translated to around 5% GDP growth. For China, about 6% average growth in coal
use translated to around 9% average GDP growth from the 1960s to 2005. Decline
in coal use by China also showed decline in GDP growth over the past three
years.
Three, among the
world’s biggest economies in terms of GDP size are also the world’s biggest
consumers of coal energy — the US, China, India, and Japan.
This is not to say that
coal use is the single most important factor for fast or slow growth of
countries, no. There are a dozen other factors of course, but having cheap,
stable and reliable electricity is one of the most important prerequisites to
have high and sustained growth. No big manufacturing, banking, tourism projects
will stay in a country which has frequent blackouts, or there is zero blackout
but electricity prices are high due to frequent use of diesel gensets.
The climate alarmism
movement is dishonest and deceptive. If there is less rain, less floods, less
snow, they say it is proof of “man-made” warming/climate change/CC. If there
are more rains, more floods, more snow, they say it is also proof of “man-made”
warming/CC. And so we send more money (taxes, subsidies) to the UN, government
and their new crony firms. Whatever weather and climate.
Climate change is true
but it is cyclical and natural, largely nature-made and not man-made. To say
that we need more government, more UN, and mandatory renewable energy to fight
less rain and more rain, less floods and more floods, is a cheap but painful
insult to our brains and pockets.
No comments:
Post a Comment