Published October 11, 2019, 10:00 PM
By Myrna
M.Velasco
Amid new reports of a deal with
Russia on prospective deployment of modular nuclear reactors, the Senate has
prodded the Department of Energy (DOE) to be more transparent and might as well
disclose all key information relating to that agreement.
Senate Committee on Energy Chairman
Sherwin T. Gatchalian took the energy department to task at the scrutiny of the
P97 million worth of budget that it has been asking for the supposed onward
development of the country’s nuclear development program.
Energy Secretary Alfonso G. Cusi
indicated that the new deal with Russia’s Rosatom State Atomic Energy
Corporation delves with the conduct of a feasibility study for possible
installation of modular nuclear technology as part of the future energy mix of
the Philippines.
He qualified that the deal is at
very preliminary stage and it just entails the need to undertake a study on
that particular facet of nuclear technology deployment – which will then serve
as supplement to the proposed nuclear power development agenda that the DOE has
already submitted to the Office of the President.
Gatchalian nevertheless chided the
DOE that the compass on the country’s nuclear power development program seems
swinging in all directions – and it has not been tracking any particular
pathway.
“Right now, it appears that there’s
no direction,” he stressed, raising a further query that “if there’s no
direction, does that mean that we still pursue or is that a tacit signal to
pursue?”
The lawmaker asserted that the
government already spent P48 million for the proposed nuclear power program –
and there is proposal to allocate additional P97 million for next year. To sum
up, that will already redound to P135 million spending and nothing has been
concretized yet even at just the level of nuclear power policy for the country.
If truth be told, Gatchalian
averred, “We don’t know whether the President wants to pursue it or not,”
citing that in the recent deal cemented with Russia, the President went up to
the extent of making a statement that “this (nuclear power deal) might be unconstitutional.”
Gatchalian further whined that
“Right now, we don’t have a signal from the President on whether to go or not
to go. And yet we are undertaking more studies.”
And at this stage wherein the
country’s proposed nuclear power development agenda is not really gaining
traction especially on the social acceptance domain, Gatchalian opined that the
DOE must foster more transparency on its nuclear power policy crafting, as in
the process, such may help shore up public acceptance on that targeted technology
option.
“I think the more transparency we
show the public, the more confidence that we build,” the lawmaker emphasized.
Further, he is requiring the DOE to submit a breakdown of how it spent its
allocation last year for its nuclear power study.
No comments:
Post a Comment