October 21, 2019 | 10:05 pm By Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr.
KUALA LUMPUR —
I came to the capital city of Malaysia to speak at the Liberalism Conference of
the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) last Saturday, along with
the launching of the International Property Rights Index (IPRI) 2019 by the
Property Rights Alliance.
Whenever I go abroad I
always observe how high or low the energy use is of the cities that I visit. It
is obvious that energy use here in Kuala Lumpur is high — streets, tollways,
buildings and other structures are well lit at night, there are many MRT, LRT,
and Monorail (running on electricity) trips per hour and the MRT/LRT stations
underground are well lit and air-conditioned.
Malaysia has only 32 million
people and its total electricity generation in 2018 was 168 tera-watt hours
(TWH). In contrast, the Philippines has 108 million people and its electricity
generation last year was only 100 TWH. Malaysia depends largely on natural gas
plus coal (65 + 68 TWH) for power generation and this energy mix is similar to
Japan’s.
I revisit two data sets
that I put in my two recent energy columns here. Again, data on coal
consumption in million tons oil equivalent (mtoe) is from the BP Statistical
Review of World Energy (June 2019), data on population and GDP growth are from
the World Bank, World Development Indicators database (August 2019). Dividing
coal consumption over population, the kilos of oil equivalent (koe) per capita
is derived. Growth rates in coal use and GDP are averaged per 10 years.
One, countries with
high consumption of cheaper energy like coal, represented by their high coal
koe per capita, also have higher income — Australia, South Korea, Taiwan,
China, Japan, and Malaysia.
Two, the Philippines
has the lowest, the smallest coal consumption among the major and emerging
Asian economies — only 153 koe per person in 2018. Only one-fourth of Malaysia,
one-sixth of Japan, one-ninth of China, and only 1/11 of South Korea and
greenie Australia. Hong Kong’s per capita was 662 in 1998 and 837 in 2018 while
Singapore’s was 0 in 1998 and 163 in 2018 or slightly higher than the
Philippines. And the anti-coal groups and people in the Philippines say that
ours is already high and scary that we should stop building new coal plants and
retire soon existing ones? Lousy and idiotic argument.
Three, there is clear
correlation between growth in cheap energy coal consumption and growth in GDP,
at least for the countries covered above. Australia, Japan, and South Korea
decelerated coal use from 2006 to 2018 and they also experienced growth
deceleration. Malaysia, Vietnam, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines retained
their high coal use and they also retained their high GDP growth.
While most anti-coal
groups are watermelon (green outside, red inside) activists, some are
outrightly pushing for their natural gas business. Demonize coal, prevent the
construction of more coal plants so that the big distribution utilities and
electric cooperatives will be forced to buy from their soon imported and more
expensive LNG power to prevent massive blackouts in the country due to insufficient
power supply.
Again, climate change
is cyclical and natural, the warming-cooling cycle having been going on since
planet Earth was born some 4.6 billion years ago. This is nature-made global
warming and global cooling, not man-made or anthropogenic. The deceptive and
dishonest “man-made” Climate Change narrative is part of global and national
corruption to justify endless and rising oil/carbon taxes, renewables
subsidies, climate loans, climate bureaucracies, and junkets.
We need more energy
security to sustain fast economic growth and job creation. Cheap, stable and
reliable energy that is dispatchable on demand, requires less land per MW of
power generation. It is not dependent on the weather and requiring huge tracts
of land that can otherwise be used for more food production and forest
protection.
No comments:
Post a Comment