by Myrna Velasco April 10, 2016
GENERAL SANTOS CITY – Local firm
Millennium Energy, Inc. has elevated its concern to the Energy Regulatory
Commission (ERC) that it has been incurring huge losses due to the hefty
distribution charges set by Manila Electric Company (Meralco) branding its
contract with the power distributor “unreasonable.”
In an interview with reporters over
the weekend here, ERC Chairman Jose Vicente B. Salazar noted that Millennium
Energy in a letter indicated its dilemma of not being able to offer its
capacity in the Wholesale Electricity Spot Market.
“Millennium is losing a lot of
money. They are already fighting. Millennium already rescinded its contract
with Meralco because it can no longer pay its obligations,” the ERC chief
disclosed.
He added that Millennium Energy’s
stand as communicated to the ERC had been that: “This contract is unreasonable,
so I will not pay anymore.”
Millennium Energy owns the Navotas
gas turbine power asset, of which 100-megawatt capacity had been offered as
embedded capacity to Meralco.
The part of the deal being complained
about by Millennium Energy, according to Salazar, is on their Distribution
Wheeling Service Agreement (DWSA).
The ERC chief pointed out that
Millennium Energy is also being held liable for violating the must-offer rule
of the WESM – because while its capacity is available, it has not been making
offers to the spot market due to this ‘contractual conflict’ with Meralco.
Salazar reiterated that Millennium
Energy has been “incurring huge losses, because the rate imposed by Meralco is
very high under their DWSA.”
The ERC chief qualified though that
such tariff is non-bypassable charge and it is being imposed to all generators
using the distribution lines to get their capacity delivered to end-users. The
differing factor, he said, has been the level of charges because the plant was
aligned as embedded capacity to Meralco.
“This is one thing that is crucial
with the agreement, Millennium has to pay for it despite the fact that its
capacity is not being called in the market for dispatch,” Salazar said.
The ERC chief added, the contention
is “that’s like a highway, that you need to pay the charges even if you’re not
using them… it’s always reckoned based on the capacity that you can actually
offer to the market.”
No comments:
Post a Comment