Jonathan L. MayugaSeptember
28, 2016
The Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) would soon look into the merits of
mining projects using the Total Economic Value (TEV) tool, although, this
early, miners are already saying this is against the law.
Environment Secretary
Regina Paz L. Lopez announced the planned shift to the TEV, after she revealed
that 20 more operating mines face suspension based on the findings and recommendation
of the audit teams. The DENR had already suspended 10 operating mines
since Lopez took over the helm of the agency in June.
The audit criteria
include environmental, social and biodiversity considerations on top of the
physical or technical aspect in assessing mining operations.
The TEV is a
cost-benefit analysis scheme that refers to the value derived by people from
natural resources compared to losing them.
‘TEV is scientific’
The “scientific and
accurate” TEV system, as described by Lopez, would help guide the DENR in
making decisions whether to allow or stop a mining operation.
According to Lopez,
while mining companies rake in profits from their operations, the state, which
is theoretically the owner of the natural resources, is not getting enough. Worse,
she said, people in the communities are suffering because of the environmental
damage.
“People on the ground
do all the sufferings, the environment, livelihood. How are we
benefiting here? What are we losing here?” Lopez, an environmental advocate,
said.
Using the TEV scheme,
the DENR will monetize the benefits from mining and match it against the
relevant costs.
“We will monetize the
benefits from mining. Then we will monetize the destruction…land,
water, [impact to] health,” Lopez said.
Lopez added that if the
cost outweighs the benefits, it follows that the project should be scrapped.
‘TEV is
unconstitutional’
Dante Bravo, president
of Global Ferronickel Holdings Inc., told the BusinessMirror that for existing
projects, imposing the TEV will be unconstitutional.
According to Bravo, a
lawyer, aside from not being specified under the Philippine Mining Act of 1995,
the government will be violating the Constitution in imposing TEV as a means of
evaluating existing projects.
“Under the Constitution,
you cannot impair contract obligations,” he said.
He said for new mining
projects, mining companies may need to study it on a case-to-case basis.
“If the impact of the
TEV will be minimal, say for nickel, it will most probably not apply,” he said.
What TEV?
Ronald Recidoro, vice
president for legal and policy of the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines
(COMP), said there is a need to get more details about Lopez’s proposal.
“We want to know more
about her idea of TEV,” he said.
Recidoro added that the
COMP, which represents mining industry’s big players is willing to cooperate
with the government and will continue to adhere to the highest standard of
responsible mining.
“If we are invited to
talk about TEV, then we might sit and talk and ask more about her idea,”
Recidoro said.
The COMP earlier came
up with a statement criticizing the DENR for “changing the rules of the game,”
referring to the conduct of the mining audit.
Recidoro also chided
the DENR for what he described as erroneous announcement, which gives investors
a wrong impression of mining companies that were not really suspended but were
merely issued “show cause orders” for minor violations.
“What we are saying is
this—the announcement is affecting investors’ confidence and has impact on the
stock market,” he said.
The COMP decried the
results of the mine audit, which Lopez announced on Tuesday.
According to Lopez,
based on the findings and recommendations of the audit teams, only 11 of the 41
operating mines are seen fit to continue their operation, after 20 more mines
were found to have failed environmental standards, bringing to 30 the number of
operating mines facing suspension.
Experts from various
fields, headed by academic institutions, conducted TEV in three mining areas in
Palawan, Bicol and Mindoro, and found out that the costs outweigh the benefits.
In all three studies,
Lopez said farmers, fishermen, and even those living in the communities suffer
the effects of the mining operations in terms of lower agricultural and fisheries
production, and the cost of having health problems.
Lopez after
irresponsible miners
Lopez reiterated that
she is only against irresponsible mining and is willing to work with mining
companies that are responsible enough to give communities what they are due.
“I would like to work
with mining companies, the ones that want to continue to exist,” she said.
To do the TEV, Lopez
said the DENR would tap experts, including agriculturists, foresters, marine
biologists, health and tourism, to monetize the cost and the benefits.
To do this, she said
the DENR would have to establish a baseline data, identify the major impacts,
quantify it and then do the math.
‘Shallow’ programs
Lopez also said mining
companies operating in the Philippines can do better than sponsoring
scholarship programs, or medical missions, as part of their social development
and management programs.
Such programs,
according to the DENR chief, are in fact, “shallow.” She wants mining companies
to implement programs that would really help alleviate poverty.
No comments:
Post a Comment