by Myrna Velasco September
18, 2016
The Energy Regulatory Commission
(ERC) and Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) are already hammering out an
arrangement that shall split their functions in handling anti-competitive cases
in the power sector.
The proposal will be
for the ERC to undertake preliminary investigation of lodged anti-competition
cases; while the PCC takes charge of the evaluation process.
“What we’re looking at
is cooperation wherein there would be delineation of responsibilities. We could
do the preliminary investigation, then they (PCC) can do the actual evaluation
of the findings,” ERC Commissioner Alfredo J. Non said.
He said the set-up
could be likened to their current framework wherein the ERC-underpinned
investigation unit (IU) does its own probe of cases, then it eventually
elevates its findings to the Commission.
“It is a risk but that
happens anywhere, even in the Courts. The fiscal (prosecutor) could have its
own findings and then the judge will decide – that’s how it will work
also here,” Non stressed.
For the relevant
parties in the case, he noted that “if they will not agree, then they can make
appeals on the decision.”
Non qualified that the
ERC-PCC sharing of responsibilities in disposing ‘power market abuse cases’
shall only cover prospective complaints, and will not include the ‘perfect
storm’ events of November-December, 2013.
The ERC, he said, is
now advancing that to evidentiary hearing phase – and the Commission is still
intending to engage resigned Director Isabelo Joseph P. Tomas II to be part of
the IU so the shift will not unduly affect evaluation process of the 2013
anti-competitive cases.
The official of the
regulatory body indicated that one major concern thrown their way is “on the
question of jurisdiction” with some parties sounding off that the cases may
already be tossed unto the charge of the PCC.
No comments:
Post a Comment