Published
By Myrna M. Velasco
The new chairperson of
the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has her ‘breaking of the bread’
discussion-session with most of the groups opposing the approval of the power
supply agreements (PSAs) of the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to
extensively understand each other on disquieting concerns relating to the
matter.
ERC chairperson Agnes
T. Devanadera isn’t the ‘church girl’ pontificating on industry issues, but she
emphasized that the intent of the dialogue is to “listen to their issues and
concerns”, primarily on the supply deals of the country’s biggest power utility
that had not been covered by competitive selection process (CSP) due to the
policy’s deadline extension.
The ERC chairperson
related that “this consumer dialogue started from a simple conversation and has
now developed into a forum where we can discuss the consumers’ issues and
concerns on electricity consumers.”
Taking off from that
discourse, Devanadera indicated that “we will take their issues into
consideration, but we also have to manage their expectations considering the
fact that there is already a pending case before the Supreme Court on the CSP.”
The CSP is an auction
policy on the contracting of power supply of distribution utilities, as
prescribed by a Department of Energy via Circular and with underpinning rules
from the ERC.
That was originally set
in place on November 6, 2015, but its implementation had been extended to April
30, 2016 – and that warranted the filing of PSA petitions still not covered by
the CSP process.
On the perplexing
Meralco supply deal issues, the consumer-advocacy groups engaged by the ERC for
a dialogue had been the Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) and United Filipino
Consumers and Commuters (UFCC), primarily Romeo Junia, Erwin Puhawan, Mark
Tecson, Rodolfo Javellana Jr. and Uriel Borja.
Devanadera considers
such talk with the consumer groups “a positive development,” while giving word
that “this is just the first of the many forums to be held of this kind.”
The next ones being
dangled on the discussion table would be issues and concerns relating to
performance-based rate-setting (PBR) regulation processes.
In turn, the consumer
groups reportedly provided documents to Devanadera, “to apprise and aid her in
addressing their issues,” fundamentally on that elusive goal of lowering
electricity rates for consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment