By
Lenie Lectura - February 26, 2018
THE Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) posted a net income of P20.4 billion in net income last
year, up 6 percent from the previous year mainly due to higher electricity
sales.
During the company’s
operating and financial results briefing held on Monday afternoon,
the utility firm said core income stood at P20.2 billion at end-2017, 3 percent
higher than 2016’s P19.6 billion.
Last year’s revenue was
10 percent higher at P282.55 billion, from P257.18 billion in 2016. Of which,
electricity revenues amounted to P275.2 billion, while the remaining P59.6
billion accounted for distribution revenue.
Meralco said 2017
proved to be another strong year in the commercial, operating and financial
fronts.
“The year 2017 turned
out to be another good year for Meralco,” Meralco President Oscar Reyes said.
“For the first time in history, sales each month exceeded 3,000 gigawatt-hours
[GWh], so that’s something that I think helped us generate record sales in
2017.”
Consolidated energy sales
volumes for 2017 grew by 5 percent to 42,102 GWh, brought about by a growing
customer base, positive economic conditions, stable power supply and low
power-plant outages during the year.
This was underpinned by
customer retail and networks initiatives to accelerate new customer
acquisitions and energization, and to minimize distribution system
interruption, according to Meralco.
Growth in sales volume
for the first three months of the year could hit 5.5 percent, as January and
February figures are trending at a 5.6-percent and 5.3-percent growth,
respectively.
The year ended with a
total of 6.3 million customer accounts. The year also saw no significant rate
issues with the average retail price at P8.03 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) as of
December 31, 2017, the second lowest since 2010, albeit higher than in 2016,
due to higher fuel prices and depreciation of the peso versus the greenback,
which drove generation charges up and to the higher feed-in-tariff allowance,
which had been granted by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).
The company’s capital
expenditure in 2017 stood at P12.1 billion.
During the briefing,
the issue on delayed power supply agreement (PSA) approval by the ERC was
raised.
“Their approval with
urgency is needed, even as the passage of time since their filling in 2016 has
already caused significant increases in the engineering, procurement and
construction (EPC) costs and financing costs of these new power plants,” Reyes
said.
Meralco’s PSA
applications cover a total of 3,551 megawatts (MW) with various generation
companies.
These are with Redondo
Peninsula Energy Inc., Saint Raphael Power Generation Corp., Atimonan One
Energy Inc., Central Luzon Premiere Power Corp., Mariveles Power Generation
Corp. of the San Miguel Group and Global Luzon Energy Development Corp. of
Global Business Power Corp.
Meralco said a
delay in the approval of these applications and the consequent delay in the
financial close and, subsequently, the commercial operations date of the power
projects, will adversely affect the utility firm’s ability to meet demand
growth in its franchise and overall energy security in the Philippines.
“Our option is to
continue to hope,” Reyes said.
Rogelio Singson,
president of Meralco PowerGen, said the Atimonan power project is considered a
“very high priority” because it is the single biggest investment so far at P153
billion or $3 billion, which can significantly increase foreign investment.
PowerGen is Meralco’s power-generation arm.
“In terms of approval,
everything is in place from financing, EPC, BOI [Board of Investments]
approval, NGCP [National Grid Corp. of the Philippines] connection agreement,
LGU [local government unit] support, O&M [operations and maintenance]
venture; the only [thing] missing is the PSA,” Reyes said.
“Financing continues to
escalate. In this case, our EPC can’t even commit to hold the price so we are
now in serious discussion on how to hold onto our EPC contractor,” he added.
For now, all Meralco
could do is to “continue to make our case and appeal for timely action and
decision,” according to Reyes.
“These are PSA we
entered into as early as April 2016. We’ve been through all necessary due
process: we met all documentation, public hearings. We can’t stress [enough]
that these are very critical plants that will assure energy security. We don’t
think there is any valid reason for further delay,” he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment