(The Philippine Star) | Updated September 4, 2016 - 12:00am
MANILA, Philippines -
The Philippines still has a long way to go in forming a nuclear energy policy
as it requires government commitment and public awareness and
participation, said Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi.
In closing the nuclear
energy conference Thursday, he said a lot of work needs to be done before the
country can draft its own nuclear energy policy.
Nuclear conference
chairperson Maria Zeneida Angara Collinson said undertaking a nuclear power
program is a sovereign decision borne out of an extensive and comprehensive
process involving government and the public sector.
She said educating the
public on the benefits and challenges of using nuclear power is critical in the
process.
“Key challenges to the
development of a high nuclear scenario in the region include, among others:
public acceptance and safety concerns, nuclear waste issues, large upfront
investment, and uncertainty in government support,” Collinson said.
Cusi said the
government will initiate the activation of a focused body “that will help us
get all the necessary information to guide us in deciding to go or not to go
nuclear.”
The DOE chief visited
the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) on Thursday along with global
nuclear power experts as part of the three-day nuclear conference, which
sparked discussions on whether to revive the facility.
“I was told… I was the
only DOE Secretary to enter BNPP… after [Energy] Minister [Geronimo] Velasco. I
was surprised with what I saw… I didn’t expect to see it that way,” he said
about the extent of rehabilitation work that needs to be undertaken to
make the plant operational.
Putting the BNPP into
commercial operations would cost around $1 billion with rehabilitation work
taking five years to be completed, said National Power Corp. (Napocor)
asset management head Mauro Marcelo.
Napocor manages and
maintained the BNPP for P27 million a year under the Aquino administration.
But reviving the
nuclear program is a risk the country cannot afford in pursuing energy
security, said Reuben Muni of Greenpeace Philippines said in a phone interview.
“This is an expensive
distraction from pursuing the real long-term solution, which is pursuing
renewable energy. We know it’s a dangerous technology… we have seen nuclear
power disasters,” he said.
The BNPP was supposed
to operate commercially in 1986 but was mothballed due to strong opposition
from environmental and cause-oriented groups over safety concerns and reports
former president Ferdinand Marcos received about $80 million in kickbacks from
builder Westinghouse. The 2011 nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan strengthened
the country’s resolve not to pursue the development of nuclear power.
The Philippine
government, in partnership with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
and International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC), has just
finished a three-day conference convening global experts on nuclear energy
development.
No comments:
Post a Comment